<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Regulatory Changes Outlaw “Bundling” of Services with Advice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.amicusadvisory.com.au/regulatory-changes-outlaw-bundling-of-services-with-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.amicusadvisory.com.au/regulatory-changes-outlaw-bundling-of-services-with-advice/</link>
	<description>Independent Advisory Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 04:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gaurav		</title>
		<link>https://www.amicusadvisory.com.au/regulatory-changes-outlaw-bundling-of-services-with-advice/#comment-6</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaurav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 02:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amicusadvisory.com.au/?p=642#comment-6</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ASIC have continued to turn a blind eye to companies who claim their investment advisory business is &#039;independent&#039; even though the conflicts of interest are easy to see from their product manufacturing/distributing divisions - the advisory business masquerades as a real business, luring potential clients in through a &#039;race to the bottom&#039; for investment advisory fees, while the real money, both for the company and their employees, is made from the manufacturing/distributing side where commissions and platform fees are rife. 

In the end, the client who accepts this cheap non-independent advice suffers, knowingly or not, through the poor advice that they receive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASIC have continued to turn a blind eye to companies who claim their investment advisory business is &#8216;independent&#8217; even though the conflicts of interest are easy to see from their product manufacturing/distributing divisions &#8211; the advisory business masquerades as a real business, luring potential clients in through a &#8216;race to the bottom&#8217; for investment advisory fees, while the real money, both for the company and their employees, is made from the manufacturing/distributing side where commissions and platform fees are rife. </p>
<p>In the end, the client who accepts this cheap non-independent advice suffers, knowingly or not, through the poor advice that they receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
